{"id":6227,"date":"2019-02-26T15:16:55","date_gmt":"2019-02-26T15:16:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/demo.goodlayers.com\/attorna\/?p=6227"},"modified":"2025-02-19T20:12:02","modified_gmt":"2025-02-19T20:12:02","slug":"far-far-away-behind-the-word-mountains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/2019\/02\/26\/far-far-away-behind-the-word-mountains\/","title":{"rendered":"Bebeklik d\u00f6nemi a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131 ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmektedir"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<\/span>\n\n\n\n

T.C.
YARGITAY<\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130
    E. 2017\/3976
    K. 2017\/9562
    T. 18.9.2017<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n
    • SA\u011eLIK TEDB\u0130R\u0130N\u0130N UYGULANMASI \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken Zorunlu A\u015f\u0131lar\u0131 Ailesinin Yapt\u0131rmaktan Ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn Beden Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Hakk\u0131nda 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanununun 5. Maddesinin (1.) F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (D) Bendi Uyar\u0131nca Sa\u011fl\u0131k Tedbirinin Uygulanmas\u0131na Karar Verilmesinin Talep Edildi\u011fi )<\/li>
    • KORUYUCU VE DESTEKLEY\u0130C\u0130 TEDB\u0130RLER ( \u00c7ocu\u011fun \u00d6ncelikle Kendi Aile Ortam\u0131nda Korunmas\u0131n\u0131 Sa\u011flamaya Y\u00f6nelik Dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k E\u011fitim Bak\u0131m Sa\u011fl\u0131k ve Bar\u0131nma Konular\u0131nda Al\u0131nacak Tedbirleri Kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Sa\u011fl\u0131k Tedbirinin \u00c7ocu\u011fun Fiziksel ve Ruhsal Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 ve Tedavisi \u0130\u00e7in Gerekli Ge\u00e7ici veya S\u00fcrekli T\u0131bbi Bak\u0131m ve Rehabilitasyonuna Ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131k Yapan Maddeleri Kullananlar\u0131n Tedavilerinin Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Y\u00f6nelik Oldu\u011fu )<\/li>
    • KORUNMA \u0130HT\u0130YACI OLAN \u00c7OCUK ( Daha Erken Ya\u015fta Ergin Olsa Bile On sekiz Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 Doldurmam\u0131\u015f Ki\u015fiyi Kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Korunma \u0130htiyac\u0131 Olan \u00c7ocu\u011fun Bedensel Zihinsel Ahlaki Sosyal ve Duygusal Geli\u015fimi \u0130le Ki\u015fisel G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Tehlikede Olan \u0130hmal veya \u0130stismar Edilen Ya Da Su\u00e7 Ma\u011fduru \u00c7ocu\u011fu Kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 )<\/li>
    • K\u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130N DOKUNULMAZLI\u011eI\/MADD\u0130 VE MANEV\u0130 VARLI\u011eI ( Herkesin Ya\u015fama Madd\u00ee Ve Manev\u00ee Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Koruma ve Geli\u015ftirme Hakk\u0131na Sahip Oldu\u011fu )<\/li>
    • ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130REYSEL BA\u015eVURU KARARI ( Bebeklik D\u00f6nemi A\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Uygulanmas\u0131na Muvafakat Etmeyen Ebeveynler Hakk\u0131nda Bebeklik D\u00f6nemi A\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Hususunda Zorunlu Sa\u011fl\u0131k Tedbiri Uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n Kanunilik \u015eart\u0131n\u0131 Ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. Maddesinde G\u00fcvence Alt\u0131na Alman “Ki\u015finin Maddi ve Manevi Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 ve Geli\u015ftirilmesi Hakk\u0131n\u0131 \u0130hlal Etti\u011fi\/\u0130hlali ve Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 Ortadan Kald\u0131rmak \u0130\u00e7in Yeniden Yarg\u0131lama Yap\u0131lmak \u00dczere Dosyan\u0131n \u0130lgili Mahkemesine G\u00f6nderilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/li>
    • YEN\u0130DEN YARGILAMA YOLU ( Anayasan\u0131n ve A\u0130HS \u0130le T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin Taraf Oldu\u011fu Eki Protokollerin Ortak Koruma Alan\u0131nda Bulunan Temel Hak ve \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fi \u0130ddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6ncelikle Genel Yarg\u0131 Mercilerinde Ola\u011fan Kanun Yollar\u0131nda \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcme Kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi\/Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Ba\u015fvurunun \u0130kincil Nitelikte Bir Yol Oldu\u011fu – 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5\/1-D Maddesine Dayanan Benzer Uygulamalarda Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Konusu Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Halinde Y\u00fcksek Mahkemece Hak \u0130hlalinin Tespit Edilece\u011fi ve \u0130hlalin Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 Ortadan Kald\u0131rmak \u0130\u00e7in Yeniden Yarg\u0131lama Yolunun A\u00e7\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 – Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Bu Husustaki Bireysel Ba\u015fvuru Sonucu Ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130hlal Karar\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Hak \u0130hlaline Yol A\u00e7mamak \u0130\u00e7in H\u00fckm\u00fcn Bozulmas\u0131 Gerekti\u011fi )<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      2709\/m. 17<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      5395\/m. 3\/1-a, 5\/1-d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \u00d6ZET : Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, zorunlu a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131 ailesinin yapt\u0131rmaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn beden sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck hakk\u0131nda 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanununun 5. maddesinin (1.) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi uyar\u0131nca sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece “Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Ba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131klama Program\u0131nda yer alan a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6nemiyle ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klama ve e\u011fitime ra\u011fmen ebeveynleri taraf\u0131ndan a\u015f\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na izin verilmeyen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuncun 3. maddesinin (1.) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca korunmaya muhta\u00e7 \u00e7ocuk olarak kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011finden bahisle \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda, belirtilen Kanun’un 5. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi gere\u011fince sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yasal temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Anayasa Mahkemesi bireysel ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131yla; “bebeklik d\u00f6nemi a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131na muvafakat etmeyen ebeveynler hakk\u0131nda bebeklik d\u00f6nemi a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda zorunlu sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n\u201d kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6ylelikle Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alman “ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine” karar vermi\u015f, ayn\u0131 karar\u0131nda ihlali ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n ilgili mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesini de kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin saptad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hak ihlalinin, mahkeme karar\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen ve Kurulu\u015f Kanununun 50. maddesinin (2.) f\u0131kras\u0131nda dayanarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 “ihlali ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak \u0130\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na” dair karar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, derece mahkemelerinin ba\u015fvuru konusu somut olay ve ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan art\u0131k ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc karar vermesine olanak yoktur. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bu husustaki bireysel ba\u015fvuru sonucu ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihlal karar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda hak ihlaline yol a\u00e7mamak i\u00e7in h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukarda tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      KARAR : Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, 23.02.2015 do\u011fumlu \u2026’e yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken zorunlu a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131 ailesinin yapt\u0131rmaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn beden sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck hakk\u0131nda 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanununun 5. maddesinin (1.) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi uyar\u0131nca sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, mahkemece “Geni\u015fletilmi\u015f Ba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131klama Program\u0131nda yer alan a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6nemiyle ilgili olarak yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klama ve e\u011fitime ra\u011fmen ebeveynleri taraf\u0131ndan a\u015f\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na izin verilmeyen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuncun 3. maddesinin (1.) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca korunmaya muhta\u00e7 \u00e7ocuk olarak kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011finden bahisle \u00e7ocuk hakk\u0131nda, belirtilen Kanun’un 5. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi gere\u011fince sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yasal temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Anayasa Mahkemesi 2013\/1789 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuruda, 11.11.2015 tarihli karar\u0131yla; “bebeklik d\u00f6nemi a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131na muvafakat etmeyen ebeveynler hakk\u0131nda bebeklik d\u00f6nemi a\u015f\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda zorunlu sa\u011fl\u0131k tedbiri uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n\u201d kanunilik \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6ylelikle Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na alman “ki\u015finin maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine” karar vermi\u015f, ayn\u0131 karar\u0131nda ihlali ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n ilgili mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesini de kararla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bireysel ba\u015fvuru sonucunda verdi\u011fi ihlal kararlar\u0131, soyut ve somut norm denetiminden farkl\u0131 olarak, sadece ba\u015fvuruda bulunan ki\u015fi ve ba\u015fvuruya konu idari i\u015flem ya da karar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erli ve ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin saptad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hak ihlalinin, mahkeme karar\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen ve Kurulu\u015f Kanununun 50. maddesinin (2.) f\u0131kras\u0131nda dayanarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 “ihlali ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak \u0130\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na” dair karar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, derece mahkemelerinin ba\u015fvuru konusu somut olay ve ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan art\u0131k ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc karar vermesine olanak yoktur. Ne var ki, yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 5. maddesinin (1.) f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendine dayanan benzer uygulamalarda, bireysel ba\u015fvuru konusu yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde Y\u00fcksek Mahkemece, bundan sonra da hak ihlalinin tespit edilece\u011fi ve ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yolunun a\u00e7\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 da muhakkak g\u00f6z\u00fckmektedir. Anayasan\u0131n ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ile T\u00fcrkiyenin taraf oldu\u011fu eki protokollerin ortak koruma alan\u0131nda bulunan temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00f6ncelikle genel yarg\u0131 mercilerinde ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131nda \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 as\u0131ld\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuru ikincil nitelikte bir yoldur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Bu husus, Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bireysel ba\u015fvuruya dair bir \u00e7ok karar\u0131nda ifade edilmi\u015ftir. O halde, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi sebebi olabilecek bu hususun, derece mahkemelerinde yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 devam eden davalarda da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin bu husustaki bireysel ba\u015fvuru sonucu ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihlal karar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda hak ihlaline yol a\u00e7mamak i\u00e7in h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      SONU\u00c7 : Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukarda g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi halinde yat\u0131rana iadesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 18.09.2017(Pzt.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      T.C.YARGITAY HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130E. 2017\/3976K. 2017\/9562T. 18.9.2017 SA\u011eLIK TEDB\u0130R\u0130N\u0130N UYGULANMASI \u0130STEM\u0130 ( Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Taraf\u0131ndan Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Gereken Zorunlu A\u015f\u0131lar\u0131 Ailesinin Yapt\u0131rmaktan Ka\u00e7\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130leri S\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn Beden Sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Hakk\u0131nda 5395 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ocuk Koruma Kanununun 5. Maddesinin (1.) F\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (D) Bendi Uyar\u0131nca Sa\u011fl\u0131k Tedbirinin Uygulanmas\u0131na Karar Verilmesinin Talep Edildi\u011fi ) KORUYUCU VE DESTEKLEY\u0130C\u0130 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6038,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[2],"tags":[9,13,17],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6227"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6227"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6227\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7272,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6227\/revisions\/7272"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}