{"id":6431,"date":"2019-02-28T12:01:19","date_gmt":"2019-02-28T12:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/demo.goodlayers.com\/attorna\/?p=6431"},"modified":"2023-03-26T14:15:51","modified_gmt":"2023-03-26T14:15:51","slug":"day-care-responsibility-to-protect-children","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/2019\/02\/28\/day-care-responsibility-to-protect-children\/","title":{"rendered":"Zorunlu Mali Mesuliyet Sigortas\u0131n\u0131n bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerinden sorumlulu\u011fu  ve bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n poli\u00e7edeki tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dair Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 metni"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-container-2 wp-block-gallery-1 wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" data-id=\"6033\"  src=\"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6033\" srcset=\"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-1024x682.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-600x400.jpg 600w, http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-300x200.jpg 300w, http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-768x512.jpg 768w, http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash-1500x1000.jpg 1500w, http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/rawpixel-649905-unsplash.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<span class=\"gdlr-core-space-shortcode\" style=\"margin-top: 30px ;\"  ><\/span>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/6243 E. , 2021\/8655 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/6243 E. , 2021\/8655 K.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ticaret Mahkemesi<br><br>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki trafik kazas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi tazminat davas\u0131 \u00fczerine Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karara taraflarca yap\u0131lan itiraz incelemesinde; \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n itiraz\u0131n reddine, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurunun reddine dair verilen karar\u0131n s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc<br>KARAR<br>Davac\u0131 vekili; m\u00fcvekkilinin, 23\/06\/2016 tarihinde daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ZMS ile sigortalanan ara\u00e7ta yolcu oldu\u011funu, tek tarafl\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen kazada m\u00fcvekkilinin yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcrekli i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik tazminat\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fini ancak ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik ve ge\u00e7ici bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fini beyan ederek, fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 kalmak \u00fczere 2.500,00 TL ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik tazminat\u0131 ile 2.500,00 TL ge\u00e7ici bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere 5.000,00 TL maddi tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br>Daval\u0131 vekili, ba\u015fvurunun reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<br>Sigorta Uyu\u015fmal\u0131k Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan, talebin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 2.500,00 TL bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131n\u0131n 19.09.2018 tarihinden yasal faizi ile daval\u0131 &#8230; \u015firketinden al\u0131narak ba\u015fvuru sahibine verilmesine, ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f; karara davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>Sigorta \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen karar, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<br>1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na, davac\u0131n\u0131n kaza tarihinde 18 ya\u015f\u0131ndan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olup ya\u015f\u0131 itibariyle kazan\u00e7 getiren herhangi bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik talebinin reddedilmesinin usul ve yasaya uygun olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekmi\u015ftir.<br>2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131ndan kaynaklanan cismani zarar nedeniyle tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<br>Davac\u0131n\u0131n davaya konu kazada % 8 oran\u0131nda malul kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, 9 ay ge\u00e7ici i\u015f g\u00f6remezli\u011finin bulundu\u011fu ve bu s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n bak\u0131m\u0131na muhta\u00e7 oldu\u011fu, al\u0131nan uzman bilirki\u015fi heyeti raporuyla sabit oldu\u011fu gibi, \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti&#8217;nin de kabul\u00fcndedir. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihtilaf, bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131n\u0131n 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 gere\u011fince poli\u00e7e teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131p b\u0131rak\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<br>\u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131n\u0131n 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 gere\u011fi poli\u00e7e teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle bu kalem y\u00f6n\u00fcnden daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<br>&#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n A.5-c maddesiyle, zarar g\u00f6renin tedavisinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra tespit edilen s\u00fcrekli maluliyetine ba\u011fl\u0131 s\u00fcrekli (\u00f6m\u00fcr boyu) bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerinden, s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 ve bu teminata ili\u015fkin limit dahilinde sigortac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak; 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular \u00fczerine, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 17.07.2020 tarih- 2019\/40-2020\/40 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; KTK&#8217;nun 90. maddesindeki &#8220;bu Kanun ve bu Kanun \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde haz\u0131rlanan genel \u015fartlarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usul ve esaslara tabidir&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcndeki &#8220;bu Kanun \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde haz\u0131rlanan genel \u015fartlarda&#8221; ibaresinin Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu iptal karar\u0131 gere\u011fi; sigorta teminat\u0131na giren ve girmeyen zararlar\u0131n belirlenmesi; zarar sigorta teminat\u0131na girmekle birlikte, poli\u00e7edeki hangi teminata girdi\u011fi belirlemesinin, &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. An\u0131lan belirlemelerin, KTK ve bu kanunda h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan hallerde de Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu itibarla; Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bir k\u0131s\u0131m h\u00fck\u00fcmleri iptal edilen &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na ili\u015fkin Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar\u0131, KTK, BK ve yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131 dahilinde belirleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<br>Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin iptal karar\u0131 gere\u011fi, &#8230; Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n A.5-c maddesine g\u00f6re bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerinin s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, AYM iptal karar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak Dairemizin \u00f6nceki yerle\u015fik uygulamalar\u0131 gere\u011fi, tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususu hep birlikte ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br>A\u00e7\u0131klanan hukuki ve maddi vak\u0131alar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; davaya konu edilen ge\u00e7ici d\u00f6nem bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, poli\u00e7edeki tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle karar verilmesi gerekirken yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<br>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (1) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, (2) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine 10\/11\/2021 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>T.C YARGITAY 4.Hukuk Dairesi <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Esas: 2021\/ 14845 Karar: 2021 \/ 2469 Karar Tarihi: 07.06.2021<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI &#8211; TRAF\u0130K KAZASI SONUCU OLU\u015eAN C\u0130SMAN\u0130 ZARAR NEDEN\u0130YLE S\u00dcREKL\u0130 BAKICI G\u0130DER\u0130 ZARARINDAN OLU\u015eAN MADD\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT \u0130STEM\u0130 &#8211; S\u00dcREKL\u0130 BAKICI G\u0130DER\u0130 ZARARININ POL\u0130\u00c7EDEK\u0130 TEDAV\u0130 G\u0130DERLER\u0130 TEM\u0130NATINDAN KAR\u015eILANMASI GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 &#8211; H\u00dcKM\u00dcN BOZULDU\u011eU<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u00d6ZET: <\/strong>Dava, trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan cismani zarar nedeniyle s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan maddi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 gere\u011fi, bak\u0131c\u0131 giderinin sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin limitin t\u00fcketilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funun kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Davaya konu edilen s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, poli\u00e7edeki tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(2918 S. K. m. 90) (Karayollar\u0131 Motorlu Ara\u00e7lar Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131 Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 A.5) (ANY. MAH. 17.07.2020 T. 2019\/40 E. 2020\/40 K.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dava: Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak temyizen tetkiki davac\u0131 vekilince istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen 02.06.2021 \u00c7ar\u015famba g\u00fcn\u00fc davac\u0131 vekili Avukat \u2026 geldi. Daval\u0131 taraftan gelen olmad\u0131. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve haz\u0131r bulunan davac\u0131 vekili dinlendikten sonra vaktin darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u015fka g\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Karar: Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131 \u2026 \u015firketi nezdinde ZMMS poli\u00e7esi ile sigortal\u0131 bulunan, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde yolcu olarak bulundu\u011fu arac\u0131n 03\/06\/2016 tarihinde kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek tarafl\u0131 trafik kazas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve malul oldu\u011funu beyanla; bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daval\u0131 vekili, sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fini, ZMMS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 gere\u011fince bak\u0131c\u0131 giderinin de sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funu beyanla davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130lk derece mahkemesince Karayollar\u0131 Motorlu Ara\u00e7lar Zorunlu Mali Sorumluluk Sigortas\u0131 Genel \u015eartlar\u0131n\u0131n A.5 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k ile bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerini de kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu durumda daval\u0131n\u0131n poli\u00e7e limiti dahilinde olan s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda poli\u00e7e teminat limitinin tamam\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6dedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddine, karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>H\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili istinaf talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince; davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine, karar verilmi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dava, trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan cismani zarar nedeniyle s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131ndan olu\u015fan maddi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Davac\u0131 taraf, s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 giderinin tedavi gideri teminat\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini iddia ederek bakiye tazminat isteminde bulunmu\u015f; daval\u0131 sigortac\u0131 ise, bak\u0131c\u0131 giderine ili\u015fkin zarar\u0131n da sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve an\u0131lan teminata ili\u015fkin limitin t\u00fcketildi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur. Bu itibarla; taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ZMSS poli\u00e7esindeki &#8220;sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131&#8221; kapsam\u0131nda m\u0131 yoksa &#8220;tedavi gideri teminat\u0131&#8221; kapsam\u0131nda m\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131n\u0131n davadan \u00f6nce \u00f6dedi\u011fi 310.000,00 TL. ile sorumlulu\u011funun son bulup bulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0130lk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan, 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131 gere\u011fi, bak\u0131c\u0131 giderinin sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131na ili\u015fkin limitin t\u00fcketilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle, daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlulu\u011funun kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n A.5-c maddesiyle, zarar g\u00f6renin tedavisinin tamamlanmas\u0131ndan sonra tespit edilen s\u00fcrekli maluliyetine ba\u011fl\u0131 s\u00fcrekli (\u00f6m\u00fcr boyu) bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerinden, s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 ve bu teminata ili\u015fkin limit dahilinde sigortac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak; 01.06.2015 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular \u00fczerine, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 17.07.2020 tarih- 2019\/40-2020\/40 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; KTK&#8217;nun 90. maddesindeki &#8220;bu Kanun ve bu Kanun \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde haz\u0131rlanan genel \u015fartlarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen usul ve esaslara tabidir&#8221; b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcndeki &#8220;bu Kanun \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde haz\u0131rlanan genel \u015fartlarda&#8221; ibaresinin Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu iptal karar\u0131 gere\u011fi; sigorta teminat\u0131na giren ve girmeyen zararlar\u0131n belirlenmesi; zarar sigorta teminat\u0131na girmekle birlikte, poli\u00e7edeki hangi teminata girdi\u011fi belirlemesinin, ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. An\u0131lan belirlemelerin, KTK ve bu kanunda h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmayan hallerde de Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu itibarla; Anayasa&#8217;ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in bir k\u0131s\u0131m h\u00fck\u00fcmleri iptal edilen ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;na ili\u015fkin Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin karar\u0131, KTK, BK ve yerle\u015fik Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131 dahilinde belirleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin iptal karar\u0131 gere\u011fi, ZMSS Genel \u015eartlar\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n A.5-c maddesine g\u00f6re bak\u0131c\u0131 giderlerinin s\u00fcrekli sakatl\u0131k teminat\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kabul edilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, AYM iptal karar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak Dairemizin \u00f6nceki yerle\u015fik uygulamalar\u0131 gere\u011fi, tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 hep birlikte ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmenin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A\u00e7\u0131klanan hukuki ve maddi vak\u0131alar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; davaya konu edilen s\u00fcrekli bak\u0131c\u0131 gideri zarar\u0131n\u0131n, poli\u00e7edeki tedavi giderleri teminat\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nmak suretiyle karar verilmesi gerekirken, yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle, yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde karar verilmesi bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sonu\u00e7: <\/strong>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK&#8217;nun 371\/1-a maddesi gere\u011fince, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n HMK 373\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince KALDIRILMASINA ve \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n HMK 371. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA; ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 373\/1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca, dosyan\u0131n ilk Derece Mahkemesine, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin de B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 3.050,00 TL vekalet \u00fccretinin daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak duru\u015fmada vekille temsil olunan davac\u0131ya verilmesine ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden davac\u0131ya geri verilmesine, 07\/06\/2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/6243 E. , 2021\/8655 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; 4. Hukuk Dairesi 2021\/6243 E. , 2021\/8655 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ticaret Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki trafik kazas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi tazminat davas\u0131 \u00fczerine Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Hakem Heyetince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda; ba\u015fvurunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karara taraflarca yap\u0131lan itiraz incelemesinde; \u0130tiraz Hakem Heyetince davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n itiraz\u0131n [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6039,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[2],"tags":[7,9],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6431"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6431"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6431\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7226,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6431\/revisions\/7226"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/talhagungor.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}